Reliability and validity of a computer-based assessment of cognitive and non-cognitive facets of problem-solving competence in the business domain

bibb.id177304
dc.contributor.authorRausch, Andreas [Verfasser]
dc.contributor.authorSeifried, Jürgen [Verfasser]
dc.contributor.authorWuttke, Eveline [Verfasser]
dc.contributor.authorKögler, Kristina [Verfasser]
dc.contributor.authorBrandt, Steffen [Verfasser]
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-17T19:48:37Z
dc.date.available2018-12-17T19:48:37Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstract"To measure higher-order outcomes of vocational education and training (VET) we developed a computer-based assessment of domain-specific problem-solving competence. In modeling problem-solving competence, we distinguish four components of competence: (1) knowledge application, (2) metacognition, (3) self-concept, and (4) interest as well as thirteen facets of competence, each of which is assigned to one of the four components. With regard to ecological and content validity, rather than apply highly structured items (e.g. multiple choice items), we developed three authentic problem scenarios and provided an open-ended problem space in terms of an authentic office simulation. The assessment was aimed at apprentice industrial clerks at the end of a 3-year apprenticeship program and focused on the domain of controlling (i.e., support of managerial decisions, cost planning, cost control, cost accounting, etc.). In order to assess the non-cognitive components in our competence model, we implemented an integrated measurement of self-concept and interest that we refer to as 'Embedded Experience Sampling' (EES). The empirical section is based on a study with 780 VET students from three commercial training occupations in Germany (industrial clerks and apprentices from two similar VET programs). The focus of the contribution is on testing a theoretically derived competence model based on item response theory, the implemented scoring methods and reliability of the instrument." (Authors' abstract, BIBB-Doku)
dc.description.versionreferiert
dc.format.extent23 S.
dc.format.illustrationLiteraturangaben, Abb., Tab., graf. Darst.
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.1186/s40461-016-0035-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://bibb-dspace.bibb.de/handle/BIBB/764630
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofEmpirical Research in Vocational Education and Training
dc.relation.ispartofvolume8 (2016), H. Online-Ausg.
dc.source.urihttps://ervet-journal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40461-016-0035-y (Volltext)
dc.subject.classificationL 3 Lehr-Lern-Forschung
dc.subject.classificationL 6.3.1 Diagnose- & Messinstrumente
dc.subject.classificationL 2.3.2 Handlungs- & problemorientierte Methoden
dc.subject.classificationS 6.4.1 Kaufleute
dc.subject.otherLehr-Lern-Forschung
dc.subject.otherKompetenzfeststellung
dc.subject.otherKompetenzdiagnostik
dc.subject.otherKompetenzmodell
dc.subject.otherProblemlösen
dc.subject.otherKaufmännische Ausbildung
dc.subject.otherEmpirische Untersuchung
dc.titleReliability and validity of a computer-based assessment of cognitive and non-cognitive facets of problem-solving competence in the business domain
dc.typeElektronische Ressource
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatz

Files