Unions, work-related training, and wages : evidence for British men

bibb.id80258
dc.contributor.authorBooth, Alison L. [Verfasser]
dc.contributor.authorFrancesconi, Marco [Verfasser]
dc.contributor.authorZoega, Gylfi [Verfasser]
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-17T10:20:43Z
dc.date.available2018-12-17T10:20:43Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.description.abstract"Using data for the years 1991-96 from the British Household Panel Survey, the authors investigate how union coverage affected work- related training and how the union-training link affected wages and wage growth for a sample of full-time men. Relative to non-covered workers, union-covered workers were more likely to receive training and also received more days of training. Among workers who received training, those with union coverage enjoyed greater returns to training and higher wage growth than did those without. While some of these results have been found in previous studies, others are new. The wage results, in particular, suggest a need for rethinking the conventional view that union wage formation in Britain reduces the incentives to acquire work-related training." (author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
dc.format.extentS. 68-91
dc.identifier.urihttps://bibb-dspace.bibb.de/handle/BIBB/692010
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofIndustrial and labor relations review
dc.relation.ispartofvolume57 (2003), H. 1
dc.subject.classificationS 5.3 Personalentwicklung
dc.subject.classificationG 1.3.1.2 Weiterbildungsmarkt
dc.subject.classificationG 1.2.2.1 Lohn- & Tarifsysteme
dc.subject.classificationI 2.2.1 Westeuropa
dc.subject.otherMänner
dc.subject.otherBetriebliche Weiterbildung
dc.subject.otherErfolgskontrolle
dc.subject.otherBildungsertrag
dc.subject.otherLohnhöhe
dc.subject.otherQuantitative Angaben
dc.subject.otherGroßbritannien
dc.subject.other1991-1996
dc.titleUnions, work-related training, and wages : evidence for British men
dc.typeText
dc.typeZeitschriftenaufsatz

Files

Collections