Die Quantifizierung von Nicht-Routine : zur ökologischen Validierung des Arbeitsvermögen-Index und einem anderen Blick auf das Ersetzungspotenzial von Produktionsarbeit
item.page.bibb.id
183238
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
item.page.bibb.publisherplace
item.page.bibb.participation
item.page.bibb.citedinbibb
Zitation von einer BIBB-Publikation
item.page.bibb.researchfocus
item.page.bibb.reviewof
item.page.bibb.citationdr
Abstract
"In Prognosen zu Beschäftigungseffekten durch die Digitalisierung wird das Ersetzungsrisiko stark mit dem Anteil an Routinetätigkeiten verknüpft. Insbesondere maschinennahe Tätigkeiten gelten dabei als routiniert und daher als besonders bedroht. Auf Basis der BIBB/BAuA-Erwerbstätigenbefragung misst der AV-Index die Nicht-Routine-Anteile im Arbeitshandeln. Dabei zeigen auch maschinennahe Tätigkeiten hohe Anforderungen im Umgang mit Wandel, Komplexität und Unwägbarkeiten - und damit hohe Anteile an Nicht-Routine. Ziel des Beitrags ist die methodische Prüfung und Weiterentwicklung dieses Instruments mithilfe einer ökologischen Validierung. Dafür werden Primärerhebungen in einem Automobilwerk und einem Formenbau als Kontrastbetrieb vorgestellt. Die dort vorgenommenen qualitativen Analysen zu vier Produktionstätigkeiten werden erstens mit in den Unternehmen durchgeführten quantitativen Erhebungen des AV-Index verglichen und die Ergebnisse zweitens mit den Daten der BIBB/BAuA-Erwerbstätigenbefragung in Beziehung gesetzt. Diese Validierung des AV-Index bestätigt - zumindest für die untersuchten Produktionstätigkeiten - dessen Güte." (Autorenreferat; BIBB-Doku)
"Forecasts of the impact of computerisation on employment suggest that the likelihood that a given job will be replaced by computers is strongly linked to the proportion of routine tasks it involves. These forecasts often assume that machine-based jobs are at particular risk because they involve an especially high proportion of such tasks. In response to this assumption, the Labouring Capacity Index, based on the workforce survey jointly conducted by the German Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BIBB) and the German Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), measures the proportion of non-routine tasks different types of work involve. It shows that workers in machine-based jobs also have to master demanding challenges in response to change, complexity and uncertainty, and hence these jobs involve a high proportion of non-routine tasks. In this article, we conduct a methodical assessment of the index by means of an ecological validation and explore some ways in which it could be refined or developed. We begin by presenting primary research on a car factory and, by way of contrast, a mould-making plant. Firstly, we compare the results of qualitative analyses of four production tasks with quantitative surveys conducted at the companies, using the Labouring Capacity Index. Secondly, we compare the results of these surveys with the data from the BIBB/BAuA workforce survey. This validation process confirms the validity of the Labouring Capacity Index, at least with respect to the production tasks analysed." (author's abstract; BIBB-Doku)
"Forecasts of the impact of computerisation on employment suggest that the likelihood that a given job will be replaced by computers is strongly linked to the proportion of routine tasks it involves. These forecasts often assume that machine-based jobs are at particular risk because they involve an especially high proportion of such tasks. In response to this assumption, the Labouring Capacity Index, based on the workforce survey jointly conducted by the German Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BIBB) and the German Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), measures the proportion of non-routine tasks different types of work involve. It shows that workers in machine-based jobs also have to master demanding challenges in response to change, complexity and uncertainty, and hence these jobs involve a high proportion of non-routine tasks. In this article, we conduct a methodical assessment of the index by means of an ecological validation and explore some ways in which it could be refined or developed. We begin by presenting primary research on a car factory and, by way of contrast, a mould-making plant. Firstly, we compare the results of qualitative analyses of four production tasks with quantitative surveys conducted at the companies, using the Labouring Capacity Index. Secondly, we compare the results of these surveys with the data from the BIBB/BAuA workforce survey. This validation process confirms the validity of the Labouring Capacity Index, at least with respect to the production tasks analysed." (author's abstract; BIBB-Doku)